Untitled Document
Military connects friends, families with overseas
troops
By Alan Joch, FCW.com
When Maj. Ted Dagnal was stationed in Bosnia during the height of U.S. military
involvement in the 1990s, he learned firsthand that videoconferencing could
be a potent tool. The secure audio and video communications aided not only
command and control operations but also MWR, or Morale, Welfare and Recreation.
The Army National Guard regularly set up videoconferences between troops and
their families back home, sometimes enabling them to share dinners together.
"Videoconferencing is a big investment," Dagnal said. "But
for troops, it eases the tension and anxiety when families are separated."
Now with the Pennsylvania Army National Guard at Fort Indiantown Gap, Dagnal,
an information management branch chief, oversees more sophisticated videoconferencing
systems at armories throughout the state. By the end of the summer, about 102
Web sites will be video-connected using equipment from a variety of manufacturers.
This is a big change from Dagnal's first videoconferencing experiences. The
latest systems use IP networks, the ubiquitous data pipelines that are a mainstay
in almost any office environment. ISDN used to be king for providing the fat
pipes necessary for conferences, but now IP use is surging thanks to cheap bandwidth
and better compression technologies.
IP switch
Pennsylvania's National Guard isn't the only troop deploying videoconferencing.
In a separate implementation in Missouri, videoconferences have been commonplace
for almost a decade, said Lt. Col. Thomas Smith, director of information management
in Jefferson City, Mo. Now almost all in-state conferences travel via the IP
network.
The biggest draw of videoconferencing is daily interaction among the National
Guard's various offices. "It improves communications," Smith said.
"If somebody appears to be tuning you out during a meeting, you get [an]
opportunity to encourage them to tune back in."
In about nine months, the Missouri guard saves enough to recoup the $200,000
it budgets each year for videoconferencing equipment and service fees because
of better communications and significantly reduced travel demands, Smith said.
The guard primarily uses equipment from Polycom.
IP-based communications within the Missouri guard are cheaper and offer better
quality than ISDN, Smith said. "It costs about 70 cents a minute to do
an ISDN conference," he said. "It costs nothing with IP because we're
leveraging circuits that are already in place."
IP videoconferencing isn't just for the National Guard. A five-state region
of the Department of Veterans Affairs is using the technology to reduce medical
costs and simplify the lives of veterans who, in the past, had to schedule overnight
trips stretching hundreds of miles to receive routine care.
Using an existing Asynchronous Transfer Mode backbone, the regional VA office,
headquartered in Minneapolis, first established ISDN-based videoconferencing
six years ago among offices in Minnesota, North Dakota and South Dakota. Primarily
an administrative tool, the conferences connected administrators for meetings.
Since then, the regional office added offices in Iowa and Nebraska to the network.
About a year and a half ago, the regional center began an IP push that now sends
about 96% of the conferencing traffic through that network conduit, said Jeff
Day, senior telecommunications analyst, based in Fargo, N.D. Migrating its Tandberg
videoconferencing system from ISDN to IP cost the VA about $6,000. Twelve hospitals
and 34 clinics, many in rural areas, are now interconnected with videoconferencing.
The IP network and videoconferencing gear is now a telemedicine vehicle that's
saving money for the VA, Day said. The agency estimates that about 30% of the
region's patients can be served through telemedicine for needs such as post-operative
follow-up visits.
In the past, the VA would have paid mileage expenses and perhaps a night of
lodging for the patient and a companion, in addition to a $200 doctor's fee.
Day believes the savings easily recoup the cost of the videoconferencing system.
But more important is the added safety and comfort the system provides for patients,
particularly in the winter months.
"Why put vets in vehicles and make them travel 200 miles to a hospital,
all for what's often a 10-minute office visit?" Day asked. Cameras in local
clinics transmit images of patients and the areas of their bodies undergoing
treatment to doctors at larger hospitals in Minneapolis and other cities. Clinics
can also transmit X-rays via the IP network.
But Day warned that videoconferencing shouldn't become a technology the IT
department foists upon doctors. "Clinicians needed to tell us what they
wanted to see, otherwise they wouldn't have used the system," he said.
Regular meetings and partnerships among clinicians and the technical staff created
a videoconferencing system on which everyone could agree, he added.
IP drawbacks
Although IP is gaining steam, not everyone is counting out ISDN just yet. Dagnal
expects that the Pennsylvania National Guard will continue to run a mix of ISDN
and IP. "With soldiers overseas, [videoconferencing] is always done through
ISDN," he said. "There are just too many networks between us and those
remote locations to use IP."
Bandwidth is another consideration. The guard strengthened its IP backbone
throughout Pennsylvania to accommodate video traffic. "You have to make
sure the network is robust enough, otherwise someone will send a PowerPoint
presentation while you're trying to do a [conference], and there goes the value
add" of the videoconferencing investment, Dagnal said.
He also complained that while vendors tout IP videoconferencing standards,
compatibility among different products isn't guaranteed. "Some [systems]
just don't work well together, even though everyone adheres to certain video
standards," Dagnal said. "Our experience is that some products just
don't interface very well, and we find out the hard way when the connection
goes down in the middle of a conference."
Concerning network traffic, vendors said recent innovations have reduced the
bandwidth need of new systems. The latest compression standard, H.264, enables
broadcast-quality video at a relatively modest bandwidth requirement of 120
kilobits/sec, compared to earlier systems that needed three times that amount,
according to John Cardillo, director of the federal group for videoconferencing
vendor Tandberg.
Smith agreed that H.264 is a boon for videoconferencing. "We're getting
good quality across 256 kilobits/sec circuits with nine concurrent users,"
he said. "We would have needed a minimum of a T1 [1.544 megabits/sec] line
previously."
Security is another concern about IP networks, especially within the military.
Videoconferencing equipment routinely ships with embedded software encryption
technology that meets government-specified Advanced Encryption Standard levels,
which secures video content as it travels across IP networks.
But this can lead to other problems. Content must move across firewalls that
protect IP networks without even a one-second time lag that can interrupt communications.
"Many security provisions make it more difficult for videoconferences
to be established across the firewalls, especially for constituents, or contractors,
and others not within the federal sector," Perey said. Firewall traversal
tools offered by videoconferencing vendors include proxy devices, authenticated
by the firewall, that send communications through secure ports.
Perey said traversal challenges remain. "Solutions are many, but none
are easy" to implement, she said. "Users and managers may have to
sacrifice some functionality" of IP-based systems. For example, a videoconferencing
user may be allowed to only place outgoing calls and not receive calls from
outside the network. Because ISDN communications are direct links that don't
traverse a shared network, security is more straightforward for those systems,
experts say.
Making choices
Despite some concerns, public-sector users and vendors agree that IP-based
videoconferencing will continue to grow. But choosing the right pipeline is
only one piece of a successful videoconferencing implementation.
When choosing the endpoints - the terminals conference attendees use to communicate
with one another - technology managers first need to understand the organization's
videoconferencing goals, said Dean LeClerc, director of emerging technologies
for systems integrator Whalley Computer Associates Inc.
Equipment varies for one-on-one meetings, communications among small groups
or large group meetings. Some products also offer tools to display and manipulate
various types of data, such as a word-processing document or a spreadsheet,
during the video meeting. "The content may be just as important as a person's
face," LeClerc said. Unless, of course, you're a soldier away from home.
|